After 21 years of working with Catholic capital campaigns throughout the country, ISPD recently evaluated the differences between effective campaigns and ineffectve campagins. Using a cross section of 22 campaigns, the points listed below proved consistent. As a learning tool, this chart can be used to forewarn as weel as remind. Fortunately or unfortunately, there are no short cuts to an effective campaign. Everyone must step up, join the team and be a leader – starting at the top and filtering throughout the entire institution. Campaigns are a yardstick to measure quality.
Effective Approach
- Active, involved pastor/president/principal
- Clear case for support
- Organizational Plan is followed.
- Very best leaders are in place.
- Staff supports the campaign 100%.
- Consultant/coach/mentor in place
- Campaign materials are effective.
- Campaign grows out of long-range planning
- Effective Feasibility Study done in advance.
- Campaign leaders follow the advice of coaches.
- Proactive attitudes – feeling of “We can do this!”
- Excellent attendance at meetings
- All leaders willing to roll up their sleeves and work.
- Suggested timeline is followed.
- Campaign leaders give gifts right away.
- Organized and effective reporting system
- Communication system working across the lines
- Tight organizational structure with divisions
- Pacesetter divisions lead the campagin
- Right people are in the right divisions
- Effective Pacesetter Kick-Off Reception
- Public Kick-Off involves entire parish
- Personal approach is the norm.
Effective Results
- Campaign $$ goals are met.
- Campaign people goals are met.
- Parish, as a whole, feels sense of accomplishment.
- Stewardship of Offering increases.
- New leadership emerges.
- Planned Giving effort flows out of campaign.
- Donors are looking forward to tangible results.
- Groundbreaking is scheduled and used as visible proof of success.
- Development Office is seen as vital to the future
- Development Director has positive position in parish.
- Pastor is seen as the person who made this happen.
- Legacy is established for the future.
- Thoughts have already turned to future planning.
- Endowment is the next step.
Ineffective Results
- Adm. with limited involvement
- Unclear case for support
- Organizational Plan changes daily.
- Campaign leaders slow to give
- A lot of second-guessing
- Attitude is re-actionary.
- Leaders afraid to “ask for the order”
- Campaign/parish leaders always deferring to someone else
- Very little follow-up work is done.
- Lack of confidence in the leadership
- Reporting system not effective
- Invites not being done personally
- Many “dropped balls” b/c of lack of sustained commitment
- Procrastination is rampant.
- Communication system not working
- Not THE top priority to parish/school
- Not enough leaders engaged
- Too many chiefs, not enough Indians
- People not willing to make sacrificial gifts
- Recruiting people to help is difficult.
- Everything is driven by $$$$$$$.
- Campaign is seen as bothersome.
Ineffective Results
- Campaign does not reach goals.
- Feeling of failure
- A lot of finger pointing
- Struggle to decide where to spend $$$
- Campaign leaders looking to bail out
- People wondering what will happen
- Tentative environment is created.
- Development Office dissolves.
- Development Director position seen as not worth the money
- “Bunker” mentality pervades.
- “I told you so” attitudes prevalent
- Struggle to turn the effort into positive
- Total Stewardship not positioned well
- Database not clean
- Recovery and healing needed
